Skip to main content
Glama
Discord Vencord MCP Bridge

Discord Vencord MCP Bridge

by clawdecode

discord_send_message

Send messages as your authenticated Discord user to the active or a specified channel, optionally targeting one by channel ID.

Instructions

Send a message as your authenticated Discord user into the current or specified channel.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "content": "<content>"
    },
    "name": "discord_send_message"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contentYesThe text content of the message to send.
channel_idNoTarget channel ID (optional, defaults to active).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It usefully discloses that messages are sent as the authenticated Discord user rather than a bot, but it does not mention permission requirements, rate limits, failure behavior, or what the response contains.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. The core action and scope are stated immediately.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter send tool, the description is minimally adequate. However, with no annotations and no output schema, it leaves gaps around permissions, error conditions, and expected return behavior that an agent would need.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters are fully documented in the schema. The description only restates the channel fallback behavior already implied by the schema and adds no syntax or format detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource (send a message) plus the channel scope and posting identity. It is clearly distinct from edit/delete/reply siblings, though it does not name them explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'current or specified channel' implies the channel_id fallback, but there is no explicit guidance on when to use this versus discord_reply_message or discord_create_dm, nor any prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.