restore_task
Restore an archived task to your active task list by providing the task ID.
Instructions
Restores an archived task.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Task ID |
Restore an archived task to your active task list by providing the task ID.
Restores an archived task.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Task ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description lacks behavioral details such as whether task must be archived, effects on state, or permissions required.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise single phrase with no redundancy, but could benefit from structured breakdown.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations or output schema, the description should provide more context on return values, side effects, and usage constraints.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and parameter description 'Task ID' is clear; description adds no further meaning beyond schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'restores' and resource 'archived task', distinguishing it from sibling tools like archive_task, delete_task, etc.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives (e.g., not to use on active tasks, no mention of prerequisites).
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/claus-92/super-productivity-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server