semantic-scholar-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to semantic-scholar-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables retrieval of academic paper metadata, PDFs, full text, citations, and references by title via Semantic Scholar, arXiv, and other sources.630 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving academic paper metadata from Semantic Scholar, including paper details, citations, and author information.21MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables to search academic papers in Japanese and English, inspect availability of full text, and download public PDFs locally.4-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching, downloading, and exporting academic papers from 20+ scholarly sources including arXiv, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar. Supports multi-source concurrent search, citation network tracing, and export to CSV, RIS, and BibTeX.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching scholarly literature across CrossRef, ERIC, Semantic Scholar, and OpenAlex, and retrieving open-access PDFs via Unpaywall.9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching academic literature via Semantic Scholar with relevance filters, batch metadata retrieval, and citation-graph recommendations.5AGPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one searches for academic papers, the other downloads a PDF by DOI. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tool names follow the verb_noun pattern (search_papers, download_paper), which is consistent, predictable, and easy to understand.
With only 2 tools, the server feels significantly under-scoped for a service like Semantic Scholar. A typical integration would include many more capabilities, such as retrieving paper metadata, authors, citations, and recommendations, making this count too low for the domain.
The tool surface covers only search and PDF download by DOI. Major functionalities like fetching paper details by ID, exploring citations/references, and author information are missing, leaving obvious gaps that could cause agent failures.