Skip to main content
Glama
cks850711

Obsidian CLI MCP Server

by cks850711
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Obsidian CLI MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • obsidian-cli-mcp

      digster
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Obsidian vaults through the official Obsidian CLI, allowing note management, search, and vault operations without plugins or API keys.
      21
      MIT

    • Obsidian MCP Server

      Storks
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides LLM agents with comprehensive access to Obsidian vaults via the official Obsidian CLI bridge. It enables users to read, search, and modify notes, tasks, properties, and plugins while the Obsidian desktop app is running.
      54
      16
      -

    • Obsidian MCP Server

      kirby-k-0723
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, write, search, and navigate Obsidian vault notes with support for CRUD operations, full-text search, graph navigation, daily notes, and frontmatter management.
      2,509 npm
      -

    • Obsidian MCP Server

      igorilic
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Obsidian vaults for creating, reading, searching, and managing notes, daily notes, TODOs, session reports, and backlinks through both stdio and HTTP/SSE transports.
      10
      2,509 npm
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only two tools with clearly distinct purposes: one executes CLI commands, the other lists blocked commands. There is no ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the 'obsidian_' prefix pattern and use descriptive names ('exec' and 'blocked_commands'), maintaining consistent naming conventions.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels minimal. While a single generic execution tool can cover many operations, having only one functional tool may be insufficient for complex agent workflows, though it is acceptable for a thin CLI wrapper.

    Completeness4/5

    The main tool can execute any allowed Obsidian CLI command, providing broad coverage. However, it lacks structured tools for common operations (e.g., read, search, create), requiring agents to parse string outputs, which introduces minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources