openalex-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to openalex-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the OpenAlex scholarly database, providing AI agents with tools to search and retrieve academic works, authors, and institutions via natural language queries.8MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for academic research using the OpenAlex API, enabling article search, details retrieval, and author profile lookup.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server providing agentic tools for academic paper search, with support for OpenAlex API and optional API keys.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for searching and exploring OpenAlex's index of 250M+ scholarly works, authors, institutions, journals, funders, and grants through Claude.44 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI agents to search and retrieve scientific papers, citations, and author profiles from Crossref, OpenAlex, and Semantic Scholar with no API keys required.526 PyPI3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for verifying academic citations via Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, and CrossRef.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a distinct entity or relationship: get vs search for authors/works, plus dedicated searches for sources and institutions, and two relationship-specific work queries (cited_by, author_works). The only slight overlap is that oa_search_works, oa_cited_by, and oa_author_works all return works, but their purposes are clearly separated by identifier filters versus term search.
All tools share the oa_ prefix and use a readable snake_case pattern: get_<entity> for lookups and search_<entity> for searches. oa_cited_by and oa_author_works break the simple verb_noun pattern but are still intuitive and consistent with the relationship-focused actions.
Eight tools is a well-scoped set for a read-only scholarly API wrapper. Each tool covers a meaningful query type without redundancy or bloat.
The core OpenAlex surface is well covered: works and authors have both exact lookup and search, with sources and institutions searchable as supporting entities. Minor gaps exist such as no get-by-ID for sources/institutions and no coverage of concepts, publishers, or funders, but the primary scholarly workflows are complete.