ndl-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ndl-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for searching Japanese Diet bills and committee Q\&A records via the NDL Kokkai API.4221 npm1MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that provides tools and prompts for searching Japanese Diet (国会) proceedings using the National Diet Library API. Enables querying meetings and speeches with various filters and obtaining direct URLs to the records.338-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for Japanese literature research that provides unified search across NDL, CiNii, J-STAGE, and other Japanese academic databases, with Skills to assist in search planning and result evaluation.3046 npm7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the OpenAlex scholarly graph API, enabling searches for authors, works, institutions, sources, and citation data. Supports optional query logging with hash-chained receipts.81MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for accessing Japanese government statistics portal 'e-Stat' API, enabling language models to search and retrieve statistical data.5100 PyPI20MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for searching Japanese government procurement notices via the Kanpou API. Enables LLMs to search by date, keyword, or detailed criteria.31-
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each search tool targets a distinct NDL dataset or scope, and get_record is clearly separate as an ID-based fetch. The main ambiguity is between ndl_search_books and ndl_search_national_bibliography, since both can return book-like records, though their descriptions clarify holdings vs. authority data.
All tool names follow a predictable ndl_<action>_<scope> pattern: get_record and search_* for the rest. This makes the set easy to navigate and avoids stylistic mixing.
Six tools is well-scoped for the server's purpose: one record retrieval tool and five search tools covering separate NDL data sources plus a combined search. No tool feels redundant or out of place.
The set covers the main NDL search surfaces and record retrieval by ID, which supports core bibliographic workflows. The main minor gap is that only the open Digital Collections subset is exposed, while wider digital collection content is not covered by a dedicated tool.