korea-scholarship-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to korea-scholarship-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables searching and harvesting Korean Citation Index literature, citation indices, and references via REST API and OAI-PMH.72MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying the Korea Citation Index (KCI) Open API to search reference lists, retrieve journal citation indices, and view citation detail history for Korean academic journals.5-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceSearch and harvest Korean academic literature and book bibliography metadata from the National Library of Korea Seoji OpenAPI via MCP or CLI.31MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables Claude to search and analyze Korean academic papers using the Korea Citation Index (KCI) Open API. Supports paper search, detailed metadata retrieval, reference analysis, author and keyword searches, and citation index queries.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that searches Korean academic databases (KCI, DBpia, RISS) via their official Open APIs, enabling Claude and other MCP clients to retrieve academic papers.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching, PDF conversion, and reference extraction for Turkish academic articles on DergiPark via MCP tools.41MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a different function—search, record detail, references, journal metrics, OAI harvesting, or source status—and the descriptions explicitly distinguish overlapping endpoints such as kci_search vs kci_harvest. The KCI search/detail pair is clearly separated by 'use kci_article to repair records returned by kci_search', so an agent should not confuse them. No two tools appear to do the same thing.
All tool names are lowercase, snake_case, and consistently source-prefixed (kci_, oak_, korea_). However, the set mixes noun-style retrieval names (kci_article, kci_references, kci_journal_metrics, oak_record) with verb-style names (kci_search, kci_harvest, oak_harvest), so it is readable but not a uniform verb_noun convention. This is a minor deviation rather than chaos.
Eight tools is a well-scoped size for a Korean scholarship metadata server covering two source families plus a status tool. Each tool contributes a distinct capability—search, detail, references, metrics, harvesting, and operational health—so none feels redundant or out of place.
The set covers KCI search, detail, references, journal metrics, and OAI harvesting, plus OAK harvesting, OAK record retrieval, and source status. The main minor gaps are the lack of an OAK search endpoint and the hard ~99-record harvest cap, but the tool descriptions explicitly document these and offer workarounds such as narrowing windows or using kci_article to enrich search results.