korea-scholarship-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to korea-scholarship-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables searching and harvesting Korean Citation Index literature, citation indices, and references via REST API and OAI-PMH.74MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying the Korea Citation Index (KCI) Open API to search reference lists, retrieve journal citation indices, and view citation detail history for Korean academic journals.5-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceSearch and harvest Korean academic literature and book bibliography metadata from the National Library of Korea Seoji OpenAPI via MCP or CLI.31MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables Claude to search and analyze Korean academic papers using the Korea Citation Index (KCI) Open API. Supports paper search, detailed metadata retrieval, reference analysis, author and keyword searches, and citation index queries.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that searches Korean academic databases (KCI, DBpia, RISS) via their official Open APIs, enabling Claude and other MCP clients to retrieve academic papers.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching, PDF conversion, and reference extraction for Turkish academic articles on DergiPark via MCP tools.43MIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool targets a distinct source+operation (KCI search/article/harvest/metrics/references, OAK harvest/record, DBpia link composition, status check), and the descriptions explicitly delimit the tricky boundary between kci_search and kci_harvest. Minor residual overlap remains between kci_search and kci_article since both return article records, though the 'repair records' framing helps.
Naming follows a clear source-prefix scheme (kci_*, oak_*, dbpia_*) that makes family membership obvious. The lone outlier korea_sources_status breaks that pattern, and noun-style names (kci_article, kci_references, oak_record) are mixed with verb-style ones (kci_search, kci_harvest), but it remains readable and predictable.
Nine tools is squarely in the well-scoped range, and each earns its place by covering a distinct source or operation. Nothing looks redundant or bolted on, and the surface is small enough for an agent to hold in mind.
The surface covers the KCI lifecycle (search, full record, harvest, references, journal metrics) and OAK harvest/record, with explicitly justified exclusions (ScienceON, RISS, DBpia search) surfaced by a status tool. Gaps are minor: no cross-source unified search, no OAK metadata search (only harvest plus identifier lookup), and no built-in export/citation formatting.