Skip to main content
Glama
ckanthony

Chisel

by ckanthony

Related Servers

Alternatives to Chisel

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that keeps raw tool output out of the context window by sandboxing and compressing results (about 98% reduction), persisting file edits, git operations, tasks and decisions in SQLite with BM25 retrieval so the agent resumes after compaction, and enforcing routing across 17 platforms via MCP and hooks. It also encourages the model to write scripts that compute answers and log only results instead of reading large data into context.
      10
      24,440 npm
      2
      Elastic 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that reduces AI agent token usage by up to 90% through intelligent context compression. Enables efficient code exploration, multi-file refactoring, and debugging by providing tools for smart reading, searching, and managing code context.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server giving coding agents context-window-aware code search and safe, atomic multi-file edits — built to cut token usage on large codebases without sacrificing correctness.
      3
      64 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Reduces token consumption by over 80% through intelligent file caching, returning only diffs for modified files and suppressing unchanged content. It features a suite of 12 tools for semantic search, batch reading, and efficient file editing to optimize LLM interactions with large codebases.
      14
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Agent-optimized MCP server that replaces built-in file, search, exec, and git tools with compact, structured JSON equivalents. Benchmarked 20–45% token savings for AI coding agents.
      20
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: file content operations (append, write, patch_apply), file/directory management (create_directory, move_file), and command execution (shell_exec). No two tools overlap in function.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names use snake_case and most follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_directory, move_file, write_file). 'patch_apply' is a minor deviation (noun_verb), but overall the naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for a file manipulation and shell execution purpose. Each tool serves a distinct role without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness2/5

    The server covers write, append, move, patch, and directory creation, but lacks essential operations like file/directory deletion and explicit file reading. Although shell_exec can partially substitute for reading, the gap is notable for a file system toolset.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive