Archery MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Archery MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI clients to interact with Yearning 2.x SQL audit platforms, including querying platform data, submitting SQL work orders, and executing read-only queries with enforced safety boundaries.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to interact with MySQL databases through tools for querying, schema management, user administration, and transaction control.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants like Claude to interact with Atomicwork tickets, requests, and workflows through natural language, providing tools for listing, searching, and managing tickets.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables defining SQL queries as callable tools for Claude, supporting MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server with parameterized queries, read-only/write modes, and a web admin UI for managing connections and tools.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with SQL Server databases for debugging and data issue resolution, providing tools for query execution, schema inspection, and diagnostics.1311 npmMIT
- -licenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage helpdesk tickets by viewing open tickets and resolving them with resolution notes via a MySQL database.-
TDQS
Scored across 27 tools
Tools are generally distinct across domains (users, groups, workflows, SQL query, instances). Minor overlap exists between sqlquery_resources and instance_resource, both retrieving resources inside an instance, but descriptions clarify different contexts (user-access vs admin config).
Most tools follow a snake_case pattern, but styles vary: some are noun_verb (user_create), while others are noun_noun_verb (resource_group_list) or noun_noun (sqlquery_instances). The verb position is inconsistent, e.g., sqlquery_describe_table places the verb in the middle.
27 tools cover multiple domains (users, groups, workflows, SQL, instances). The count is slightly high but justified by the broad scope of a database management platform. Each tool serves a specific operation without excessive redundancy.
Core workflows (SQL ticket lifecycle, CRUD for users/instances) are covered. Notable gaps: resource groups and auth groups lack update and delete tools; user management lacks role/permission assignment. Some domains feel incomplete.