Skip to main content
Glama
ck0i

hashline-mcp

by ck0i
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to hashline-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • trueline-mcp

      rjkaes
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing hash-verified file editing and targeted reads, reducing context consumption and preventing silent corruption by requiring content hashes for edits.
      21 npm
      34
      Apache 2.0

    • file-mcp

      yun-wulian
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Windows-first MCP server for deterministic file writes with atomic create, replace, and structured edit operations, preserving encoding and newline styles.
      10
      1
      -

    • file_utils MCP

      JEL-LL
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for reading and editing large text files using content-addressed anchors that survive line shifts, providing tools like read_file_range, edit_file_range, insert_at, prepend_to_file, and append_to_file.
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    hashline_read only inspects and returns content with hashes, while hashline_edit exclusively mutates files via line:hash references. Their responsibilities are complementary, so there is no realistic ambiguity about which tool to choose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools use the exact hashline_<verb> pattern, with a stable domain prefix and an action verb. This makes the API naming predictable and easy to extend.

    Tool Count4/5

    Two tools is on the low end, but it fits the server's narrow read-then-edit workflow without padding. The count is slightly minimal but reasonable for the stated purpose.

    Completeness5/5

    The read/edit pair covers the entire intended workflow: obtain hashes, make verified edits, and receive updated context. No obvious missing operation exists within the documented hashline scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources