Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Task Manager MCP Server

Task Manager MCP Server

by cjmontgom
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Task Manager MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Task Manager

      ahmadbilal339
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables creating, listing, retrieving, completing, and deleting locally persisted tasks, with filtering by pending, completed, or all status. It also exposes pending tasks as read-only data for clients to inspect.
      -

    • Project 5 MCP Server

      iamaries73
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes task-management tools over the Model Context Protocol, letting any MCP client discover and call operations to add, list, and complete tasks persisted to a local JSON file. It serves as the plug layer for a separate task kitchen module, with permissions enforced in the client.
      -

    • mcp-todo

      paulmory
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This server provides a Model Context Protocol interface for a local task management service. It enables AI assistants to manage tasks, organize projects, and view daily schedules through a robust set of provided tools.
      MIT

    • MCP Server

      AdamXiang
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create, list, and update tasks stored in a local SQLite database through Model Context Protocol tools.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Claude Code, inside the Godot 4 editorFlockbay puts an AI agent in the real Godot 4 editor: it writes GDScript, runs your game and fixes what breaks. Free, or bring your own Claude Code or Codex.flockbay.comAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: create, delete, get, and update_status target different operations on tasks. An agent can easily distinguish between them without confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_task, delete_task), with the slight variation in update_task_status still adhering to the same style. There are no mixed conventions or deviations.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 4 tools, the set feels thin for a task management domain, lacking operations like listing tasks or handling priorities. While core CRUD is covered, the count is borderline minimal for typical agent workflows.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover basic CRUD operations (create, get, delete, update_status), but there are notable gaps such as no list_tasks tool for retrieval of multiple tasks, which could hinder agent efficiency in browsing or filtering tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessOutdated data

    Resources