Skip to main content
Glama
cjkcr

X(Twitter) MCP Server

by cjkcr

Related Servers

Alternatives to X(Twitter) MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables seamless interaction with Twitter/X platform through Claude AI, allowing users to post tweets with images, search for tweets, and engage in conversations using natural language commands.
      10
      30 npm
      25
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to interact with X/Twitter via Claude, allowing posting tweets, searching, liking, retweeting, and more using OAuth 2.0 PKCE authentication.
      10
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with X (Twitter) to post tweets, threads, and replies while retrieving tweet metrics and account information. It supports core management tasks like deleting tweets and verifying authentication through the Twitter API.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tools have clear distinctions between draft creation (create_draft_tweet, create_draft_reply, create_draft_thread, create_draft_quote_tweet) and direct actions (reply_to_tweet, quote_tweet, retweet), but there is some overlap: create_draft_reply and reply_to_tweet both handle replies, differing only in draft vs. direct, which could cause confusion. Similarly, create_draft_quote_tweet and quote_tweet serve similar purposes with a draft distinction.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structure (e.g., create_draft_tweet, delete_draft, list_drafts). The naming is predictable and uniform across all tools, making it easy for agents to understand and use them without confusion.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 10 tools, this server is well-scoped for managing tweets and drafts on X (Twitter). The count is appropriate, covering creation, deletion, listing, and publishing of drafts, as well as direct tweet actions, without being overly complex or too sparse for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides good coverage for tweet and draft management, including CRUD-like operations (create, list, delete, publish) and direct interactions (reply, quote, retweet). A minor gap exists in updating drafts (e.g., edit_draft), but agents can work around this by deleting and recreating drafts, and the core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues