Discord Server Setup MCP

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states it 'shows detailed information,' which implies a read-only operation, but doesn't disclose behavioral traits like whether it requires permissions, has rate limits, or what format the information is returned in. It adds minimal context beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the purpose and includes key details. Every word earns its place with no redundancy or unnecessary elaboration.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity (read operation with one parameter) and no annotations or output schema, the description is adequate but incomplete. It specifies what information is shown but lacks details on return format, error handling, or integration with other tools, leaving gaps for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with one parameter 'templateId' fully documented in the schema. The description doesn't add any meaning beyond what the schema provides (e.g., no examples or constraints on template IDs), so it meets the baseline of 3 for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'shows' and the resource 'template' with specific details 'including all roles, categories, and channels.' It distinguishes from siblings like 'list_templates' (which lists multiple) and 'apply_template' (which applies one), but doesn't explicitly name these alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the context of needing detailed information about a specific template, but there's no explicit guidance on when to use this versus alternatives like 'list_templates' for overviews or 'apply_template' for applying. It doesn't mention prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.