Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to tasks-mcp-poc

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local task management MCP server that enables users to create, update, and manage tasks through natural language conversations with Claude. It provides nine tools for comprehensive task management including creation, filtering, searching, and daily planning without requiring a separate UI or backend service.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to run a personal task manager in natural language: creating, updating, completing, deleting, listing, and searching tasks and projects, checking an overview, and performing weekly reviews. Tasks are stored in the user's own Cloudflare D1 database via a Worker exposed over MCP with OAuth 2.1 and password-protected access.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A task management MCP server that provides tools to create, list, complete, and delete tasks using pluggable storage backends. It enables users to interact with their task lists through natural language using MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      AI-driven task management application that operates via MCP, enabling autonomous creation, organization, and execution of tasks with support for subtasks, priorities, and progress tracking.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    All tools have clearly distinct purposes. There is no overlap between create/delete/update/list operations for tasks, users, dependencies, and time tracking. Authentication tools are separate.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_task, list_tasks). The authentication tools (login, logout, whoami) break the pattern, but they are standard and easily recognizable.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools is slightly above the typical range but still reasonable for a task management server covering users, tasks, dependencies, time tracking, and authentication. Each tool serves a clear purpose.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers core CRUD for users (create, delete, list) and tasks (create, delete, update status, list) but lacks update for users and task details (e.g., edit description, reassign). Also missing a get_task_by_id tool. Time tracking and dependencies are well-covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues