Dropbox MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Dropbox MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI clients to browse Dropbox folders, search files by name or content, read plain-text files, and inspect metadata with read-only access.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceExposes the Dropbox API v2 to LLM agents as a fixed set of MCP tools, enabling file management, search, shared links, and account operations with support for Business team-space namespaces.16MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to interact with Dropbox, providing tools for file listing, search, upload, download, folder creation, deletion, move/copy, sharing, and account info.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables read-only file-management operations from AI assistants, including health checks, connection and folder listings, search, share-link resolution, metadata retrieval, and on-demand document reading.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Dropbox file operations such as listing, searching, downloading, and creating folders via the Dropbox API v2 through MCP.499 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides LLMs with secure, read-only access to local documentation by scanning directories, extracting content from PDF, DOCX, Markdown, and text files, and performing keyword searches.35 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but 'search_file_content' and 'search_files' could cause confusion as both involve searching. 'search_file_content' searches within specific files for text, while 'search_files' searches across files by name or content, but the naming similarity might lead to misselection without careful reading of descriptions.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_file_info, list_files, read_file, search_file_content, search_files). The naming is uniform and predictable, making it easy for agents to understand the action and target resource.
With 5 tools, the count is reasonable for a Dropbox file management server, covering core operations like listing, reading, and searching. However, it feels slightly thin as it lacks tools for creating, updating, or deleting files, which are common in file management domains.
The tool set covers basic read and search operations well, but there are notable gaps in CRUD coverage. For a Dropbox server, missing tools for uploading, updating, moving, or deleting files could lead to agent failures when trying to perform full file lifecycle management, limiting its utility for broader workflows.