Discord MCP Extended
Related Servers
Alternatives to Discord MCP Extended
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for Discord that enables AI assistants to interact with Discord servers, channels, and messages via the Discord API.614MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA Discord MCP server that gives AI agents full control of a Discord bot — messages, channels, roles, threads, forums, events, webhooks, reactions, moderation, image generation, and real-time voice.746MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to communicate with humans through Discord. Agents can send messages, create threads, wait for replies, and manage conversations across any MCP client.16ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLets any MCP-compatible AI client interact with Discord — send messages, manage channels, create webhooks, assign roles, and more.322MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI agents first-class access to Discord, enabling discovery, messaging, channel management, moderation, and arbitrary REST calls through typed, consent-aware tools.73MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage Discord servers, including roles, channels, members, messages, and moderation, via natural language commands.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 26 tools
All tools have clear resource-action pairs, such as category vs channel vs webhook vs message operations. Even overlapping actions like send are distinguished by medium: text channel, webhook, or voice. The only minor overlap is add_reaction vs add_multiple_reactions, but they serve distinct purposes.
Tools follow a consistent discord_verb_noun pattern with clear verbs like create, delete, and send. However, retrieval actions use mixed verbs: get (get_server_info), list (list_servers), and read (read_messages), which is a minor deviation. Overall, the naming is predictable and readable.
With 26 tools, this exceeds the recommended range and falls into the 'too many' category. While each tool covers a distinct Discord feature, the count feels heavy and some tools could be merged (e.g., add_multiple_reactions with add_reaction). The extended scope justifies some volume, but 26 is on the high side.
The tool surface covers core operations for categories, text channels, forums, webhooks, messages, and reactions. However, obvious gaps exist: no update operation for text channels or messages, and no channel-specific detail retrieval beyond server info. CRUD coverage is incomplete for certain resources, limiting full workflow automation.