create_table_with_data

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explains the core behavior (creating and filling a table at end of document) and mentions the header_bold option. However, it lacks details on side effects (e.g., impact on existing content), error handling, or required permissions. Since no annotations are provided, the description carries the full burden, and it is adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: a one-sentence summary followed by a bullet list of parameters. Every element is necessary and front-loaded, making it easy to scan.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that an output schema exists and the tool is relatively simple, the description adequately covers the action and parameters. It lacks error scenarios or validation details, but for a table creation tool, it is sufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description provides brief explanations for all five parameters in the Args section, clarifying that data is a 2D array and header_bold controls first row bolding. This adds meaningful context beyond the bare schema, though constraints like data matching rows/cols are not mentioned.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: '在文档末尾创建一个表格并填充数据' (Create a table at the end of the document and fill with data). It specifies the resource (table) and location (end of document), distinguishing it from sibling tools like insert_table_after_paragraph.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide any guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., insert_table_after_paragraph, add_table_row). No usage context or exclusion criteria are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.