Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to local-mcp-toolbox

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Secure local development platform that exposes controlled developer capabilities (FS, Git, search, command execution) to AI assistants via MCP with deny-by-default security and audit logging.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables safe, local DevOps inspection through a JSON-lines server with schema validation, path isolation, and redaction, supporting read-only Git operations, Kubernetes YAML validation, Terraform plan summaries, and sanitized log analysis.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server to inspect allowlisted Docker containers, systemd services, JSONL logs, and HTTP health endpoints without arbitrary shell access.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that lets AI assistants inspect local workspace files, search context, view git diffs, and fetch a fixed GitHub profile, all within a sandboxed stdio transport.
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server providing guarded access to a workspace with file operations, search, commands, tests, Git helpers, checkpoints, and structured tool results. It supports multiple tool modes and emphasizes security with workspace restrictions and secret blocking.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct targets: OS metadata, disk capacity, dev-tool availability, and three filesystem operations (list/metadata/read) are well separated. The only mild overlap is among system_info, toolbox_server_status, and toolbox_metrics_snapshot, which all return 'metadata/status' of a system or server, though the descriptions do differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case, which is consistent. However, the set mixes three prefixing conventions: unprefixed tools (system_info, disk_usage, installed_developer_tools), a filesystem_ group, and a toolbox_ group, which makes the namespace slightly less predictable than a single uniform scheme.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each one maps to a distinct read/introspection capability. Nothing feels redundant or padded, and no obvious operation is missing due to under-provisioning.

    Completeness4/5

    For a deliberately read-only, safety-bounded local toolbox, the surface covers system info, disk, dev tools, and the core filesystem read lifecycle (list, metadata, read). Write/search operations are absent, but the descriptions imply a read-only design intent, so this is a minor rather than significant gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues