Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Receipts Compliance MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables offline verification of signed AI-agent receipt bundles and generation of auditor-ready Markdown compliance reports for frameworks including EU AI Act Annex IV, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, and EU CRA.
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides tools to issue, verify, and export cryptographically signed receipts for AI agent actions, enabling tamper-proof audit trails for compliance with regulations like the EU AI Act.
      4
      53 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to validate deliverables (JSON, ZIP, PDF, DOCX) against signed contracts, generating verifiable receipts with Ed25519 signatures.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Append-only evidence receipts for AI records: seal, verify, cite, chain-check, anchor status. A seal proves a record existed at a time, not that its contents are true. Five tools over stdio with npx -y apex-psi-mcp — no account, no key, verification free forever.
      5
      316 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and builders to run governance assessments including A³ scorecards, evidence-chain templates, compliance checklists, passport lookup, privacy/credential scanning, and doctrine knowledge routing, with traceable audit-ready outputs. It provides local, zero-dependency tools for AI governance self-assessment and registration readiness.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides cryptographic signing and verification for AI decisions to generate verifiable, Ed25519-signed receipts for compliance and auditing. It automatically maps AI actions to regulatory frameworks like HIPAA and SOX with high-performance, sub-3ms signing.
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three non-report tools (create_constitution, build_constitution_audit, verify_manifest) are clearly distinct, and each build_* report tool names its target framework explicitly. However, eight tools share the identical shape 'build a Markdown compliance report from a receipt set,' so selection depends entirely on the agent knowing which regulatory framework applies—an easy source of misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool is snake_case with a leading verb (build_, create_, verify_) followed by a noun describing the target artifact or standard. The build_* family is uniform, and the two non-build tools still follow verb_noun convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eleven tools sits comfortably in the well-scoped 3–15 range. The count is driven by distinct regulatory frameworks rather than redundant variants, and each report tool targets a genuinely different standard.

    Completeness3/5

    Framework reporting coverage is broad (EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 23894, CRA), but the receipt and constitution lifecycle is thin: no tool to list/fetch receipts, retrieve or list constitutions, or verify an individual receipt (only a whole manifest, and only the Ed25519 half of v3 signatures). Agents can work around this if receipts are supplied externally, but the surface has notable dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues