Receipts Compliance MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Receipts Compliance MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables offline verification of signed AI-agent receipt bundles and generation of auditor-ready Markdown compliance reports for frameworks including EU AI Act Annex IV, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, and EU CRA.11MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides tools to issue, verify, and export cryptographically signed receipts for AI agent actions, enabling tamper-proof audit trails for compliance with regulations like the EU AI Act.453 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to validate deliverables (JSON, ZIP, PDF, DOCX) against signed contracts, generating verifiable receipts with Ed25519 signatures.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAppend-only evidence receipts for AI records: seal, verify, cite, chain-check, anchor status. A seal proves a record existed at a time, not that its contents are true. Five tools over stdio with npx -y apex-psi-mcp — no account, no key, verification free forever.5316 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents and builders to run governance assessments including A³ scorecards, evidence-chain templates, compliance checklists, passport lookup, privacy/credential scanning, and doctrine knowledge routing, with traceable audit-ready outputs. It provides local, zero-dependency tools for AI governance self-assessment and registration readiness.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides cryptographic signing and verification for AI decisions to generate verifiable, Ed25519-signed receipts for compliance and auditing. It automatically maps AI actions to regulatory frameworks like HIPAA and SOX with high-performance, sub-3ms signing.4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
The three non-report tools (create_constitution, build_constitution_audit, verify_manifest) are clearly distinct, and each build_* report tool names its target framework explicitly. However, eight tools share the identical shape 'build a Markdown compliance report from a receipt set,' so selection depends entirely on the agent knowing which regulatory framework applies—an easy source of misselection.
Every tool is snake_case with a leading verb (build_, create_, verify_) followed by a noun describing the target artifact or standard. The build_* family is uniform, and the two non-build tools still follow verb_noun convention.
Eleven tools sits comfortably in the well-scoped 3–15 range. The count is driven by distinct regulatory frameworks rather than redundant variants, and each report tool targets a genuinely different standard.
Framework reporting coverage is broad (EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 23894, CRA), but the receipt and constitution lifecycle is thin: no tool to list/fetch receipts, retrieve or list constitutions, or verify an individual receipt (only a whole manifest, and only the Ed25519 half of v3 signatures). Agents can work around this if receipts are supplied externally, but the surface has notable dead ends.