searchconsole-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS | No | Path to your Google Cloud service account key JSON file. This is recommended for automation and is used for authentication if you are not using system-level user credentials. |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| list_sitesA | Lists all verified properties in Google Search Console. Returns site URLs and permission levels. |
| query_search_analyticsA | Query Google Search Console search analytics data. |
| list_sitemapsB | Lists submitted sitemaps for a Search Console property. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: list_sitemaps handles sitemap management, list_sites provides property overview, and query_search_analytics focuses on search performance data. The descriptions reinforce these boundaries, making misselection unlikely.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_sitemaps, list_sites, query_search_analytics) with clear, descriptive names. There are no deviations in style or convention across the set.
With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a Search Console MCP server, lacking operations like sitemap submission/deletion, property verification, or detailed configuration management. While the tools cover core areas, the scope seems limited compared to typical API capabilities.
The tool surface has significant gaps for Search Console functionality: no create/update/delete operations for sitemaps or properties, missing tools for URL inspection, mobile usability, or security issues, and incomplete coverage of the API's core features like indexing status or rich results testing.