Skip to main content
Glama
chrisguidry
by chrisguidry

Related Servers

Alternatives to YNAB MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLM clients to analyze and manage YNAB budgets, accounts, categories, and transactions.
      27
      108 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects AI assistants to YNAB budgets, enabling natural language queries about finances backed by full API coverage and built-in YNAB methodology knowledge.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes the full YNAB API, allowing LLMs to read and manage budgets, accounts, and transactions through natural language. It features 49 specialized tools for comprehensive financial management, including category updates, money movements, and transaction tracking.
      47
      108 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that allows users to interact with YNAB data, enabling access to account balances, transactions, and the creation of new transactions through the Model Context Protocol.
      8
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for interacting with YNAB (You Need A Budget). Provides tools for accessing budget data through MCP-enabled clients like Claude Desktop.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI-powered interaction with YNAB (You Need A Budget) data, allowing users to query their budgets through conversational interfaces.
      22
      475 npm
      160
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 32 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Tools are organized by resource and action, and near-neighbors are explicitly contrasted: assign_money vs set_assigned vs move_money, list_payees vs find_payee, and get_plan_month vs get_month_category. An agent can reliably distinguish the intended tool from names and descriptions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Names consistently use snake_case with verb-first patterns such as get_, list_, create_, update_, delete_, and rename_. Pluralization is semantically consistent for batch-oriented transaction tools, and exceptions like set_assigned remain clear.

    Tool Count3/5

    32 tools is a heavy surface for an MCP server and may strain tool selection, even though the YNAB domain is broad and most tools map to real operations. The set is cohesive and not duplicative, but it sits above the comfortable range.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflows are well covered: transaction and scheduled-transaction lifecycles are complete, money movement is supported, and plan/category/account/payee reads and creates/updates exist. Gaps remain around account/category/payee deletion and some detail lookups, though these may reflect YNAB API limits.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow