Skip to main content
Glama
chrischall

untappd-mcp

by chrischall

Get Untappd distinct beers

untappd_user_beers
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve a user's unique checked-in beers with ratings and check-in counts. Supports sorting and paging; omit username to access your own account history.

Instructions

Get the distinct (unique) beers a user has ever checked in, with their rating and check-in count per beer. Supports sorting and paging. Omit username for your own account. Read-only.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sortNoSort order (default date, most recent first)
viewNoResponse shape: "compact" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; "full" returns every field this server understands. compact projects each distinct beer to {bid, name, style, abv, ibu, brewery, your_count, your_rating, global_rating, last_had}; "full" returns Untappd's whole ~1.2 KB beer record per entry, including the long beer_description and the nested brewery record.
limitNoMax beers (1–50, default 25)
offsetNoResult offset for paging (default 0)
usernameNoUntappd username. Omit to use your own configured account (UNTAPPD_USERNAME).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.10.1
    • removedInput schema / properties / compact
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Project each beer to a slim summary (bid, name, brewery, style, abv, ibu, your_count, your_rating, global_rating, last_had) to save context (default false)",
      -  "type": "boolean"
      -}
    • addedInput schema / properties / view
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Response shape: \"compact\" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; \"full\" returns every field this server understands. compact projects each distinct beer to {bid, name, style, abv, ibu, brewery, your_count, your_rating, global_rating, last_had}; \"full\" returns Untappd's whole ~1.2 KB beer record per entry, including the long beer_description and the nested brewery record.",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "compact",
      +    "full"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.1.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / compact
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Project each beer to a slim summary (bid, name, brewery, style, abv, ibu, your_count, your_rating, global_rating, last_had) to save context (default false)",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  3. First observedv0.0.0

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, and idempotentHint. The description adds useful behavioral detail beyond those: the returned set is deduplicated ('distinct (unique)'), scoped to all-time check-ins ('ever checked in'), and includes per-beer rating and check-in count. It also restates 'Read-only', which is redundant but consistent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded, with the core purpose in the first sentence and usage notes in the second. The trailing 'Read-only' duplicates the annotation, which is minor redundancy in an otherwise tight description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Even without an output schema, the description conveys the essential return content (distinct beers, ratings, counts) and the key call behavior (sorting, paging, optional username). Combined with the fully documented schema and safety annotations, nothing critical is missing for an agent to invoke this correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with every parameter already documented including enums, defaults, and the username fallback to UNTAPPD_USERNAME. The description's 'Omit username for your own account' adds no new signal beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb and resource: 'Get the distinct (unique) beers a user has ever checked in,' with rating and check-in count per beer. This clearly distinguishes it from siblings like untappd_user_checkins (raw checkin feed) and untappd_user_wishlist.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear usage context: it is for a user's distinct checked-in beers, supports sorting and paging, and explicitly says to omit username for your own account. It does not name alternatives or when-not-to-use conditions, but the intent is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/chrischall/untappd-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server