Skip to main content
Glama
chrischall

tock-mcp

by chrischall
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

tock_get_profile

Read-only

Retrieve the signed-in user's Tock account identity—name and email—from reservation records. Requires an exploretock.com browser tab signed in through the ContextMint Bridge extension.

Instructions

Get the signed-in user's Tock account identity (name, email). Requires a browser tab signed in to exploretock.com via the ContextMint Bridge extension. Derived from your reservation records, so it needs at least one reservation on the account.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
viewNoResponse shape: "compact" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; "full" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image/avatar URLs from the response; "full" returns Tock's payload untouched. No field projection: this server has no verified record of which Tock fields matter, and inventing one would risk dropping a field a caller needs.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv0.5.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / view
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Response shape: \"compact\" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; \"full\" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image/avatar URLs from the response; \"full\" returns Tock's payload untouched. No field projection: this server has no verified record of which Tock fields matter, and inventing one would risk dropping a field a caller needs.",
+  "enum": [
+    "compact",
+    "full"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}
  3. First observedv0.2.0

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations only declare read-only and open-world behavior; the description adds the non-obvious operational facts: a signed-in bridge tab is required and the identity is synthesized from reservation records, so an account with zero reservations will not yield a profile. That is exactly the kind of auth/dependency disclosure the annotations cannot carry.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences: identity and fields first, then the two preconditions. No filler, no restatement of the tool name, and nothing to trim.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a low-complexity read tool with no output schema, the description covers what is returned, what is required to call it, and the data dependency behind the result. An agent has everything needed to decide to call it and to interpret failure conditions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the 'view' enum is documented in detail in the schema itself, including what compact strips and why no projection exists. The description never mentions the parameter, so it adds nothing beyond the schema, making the baseline 3 correct.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource (get the signed-in user's Tock account identity) and enumerates the returned fields (name, email). None of the sibling tools (reservations, availability, restaurants, healthcheck) overlap with this scope, so an agent can select it unambiguously.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives clear preconditions for use: an authenticated browser tab on exploretock.com via the ContextMint Bridge extension, plus at least one existing reservation. No when-not guidance or named alternatives, but no sibling offers profile data, so the missing exclusion is low-cost.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools