thumbtack_get_pro_reviews

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true, and the description adds context that reviews are embedded on the profile page and lists the fields (rating, author, date, text). No contradiction; the extra detail about data source is valuable beyond the annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the core action 'Read the reviews', and no wasted words. Every phrase adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only tool with a full schema and no output schema, the description adequately conveys purpose, input source, and the review components returned. The read-only annotation covers safety, so no more is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already explains both parameters. The description adds a hint that the URL comes from search_pros but doesn't introduce new semantics for limit or URL format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool 'Read the reviews embedded on a Thumbtack pro's profile page' and enumerates the contents (star rating, author, date, text). This distinguishes it from siblings like get_pro (pro details) and search_pros (search).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It says 'Takes a profile URL from thumbtack_search_pros', giving a clear prerequisite and source for the input. It doesn't explicitly state when not to use it or name alternatives, but the instruction is practical and contextually sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.