No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 10 tools
Most tools are clearly separated by resource and action (events, pins, settings, sensors, locks, alarm state, lock state). The main overlaps are simplisafe_list_systems vs simplisafe_get_system (both return alarm/connectivity state, distinguished mainly by 'start here for sid' vs 'one system'), and simplisafe_list_locks vs simplisafe_list_sensors with type_name='lock', which surface much of the same lock data. Descriptions do enough to steer an agent, but these pairs could be confused.
Nearly every tool follows the simplisafe_verb_noun pattern (list_systems, get_events, get_pins, set_alarm_state, set_lock_state). The only deviation is simplisafe_healthcheck, a bare noun with no verb, though it is still unambiguous. Verb choice (list vs get) is used meaningfully and consistently.
Ten tools is well within the sweet spot and each one maps to a distinct resource or action in the alarm-system domain. Nothing feels padded: read tools for systems, sensors, locks, events, pins and settings, plus the two meaningful write operations.
The surface covers discovery, monitoring, diagnostics and the two core control actions (arm/disarm, lock/unlock), including confirmation gating and post-action verification. Gaps remain on the write side: settings are read-only (no set_settings) and PINs can be read but not created or changed, and cameras are absent. These are workable limitations rather than dead ends for the main workflow.