Skip to main content
Glama
chrischall

onthecheap-mcp

by chrischall

Check an On the Cheap site’s connectivity

otc_healthcheck
Read-onlyIdempotent

Verify a specific On the Cheap city site is reachable and its public API responds. Takes a site key and returns error details on failure.

Instructions

Verify one "on the Cheap" site is reachable and its public API is responding. Pass the site key for the city (see otc_list_sites). The sites need no credentials, so this checks connectivity only. On failure error.kind names what broke: edge_blocked (a CDN/WAF refused the request before it reached the site), http, timeout or transport. Read-only.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
siteYesWhich "on the Cheap" city to read. Required — there is no default site. One of: charlotte, denver, atlanta, chicago, columbus, seattle, kansascity, miami, orlando, portland, richmond, southernmaine, triangle, national. Common aliases also work (milehigh, raleigh, rva, southflorida, kc, …). Use otc_list_sites for the full list with the area each one covers.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Addedv0.3.3

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond annotations (readOnly/openWorld/idempotent) by enumerating failure modes via error.kind: edge_blocked (with the meaning — CDN/WAF refused pre-site), http, timeout, transport. That is exactly the operational context an agent needs to interpret a failure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four tight sentences, front-loaded with purpose, then the required param, then the connectivity caveat, then the failure taxonomy. No filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-param read-only probe with no output schema, the definition covers purpose, required input, credential-free nature, and the full error taxonomy an agent needs to act on results. Nothing material is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and already lists the enum values, aliases, and the otc_list_sites pointer. Description only repeats the sibling pointer already in the schema, adding no new param detail beyond baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb+resource: verifies a named site is reachable and its public API responds. Distinct from all siblings (list/get/search tools) — none of which perform a connectivity probe.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

States it needs a `site` key and points to otc_list_sites for valid values and coverage. Clarifies this is connectivity-only since no credentials are needed, implicitly contrasting with any authenticated operations. No explicit 'when not to use' beyond that.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.