iOffice MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to iOffice MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude to inspect and operate Apache Airflow over its REST API, providing read tools and safe write operations (gated by read-only mode) for managing DAGs, runs, tasks, and pools.14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides Claude and any MCP client with live access to property management data, enabling operations on properties, units, leases, tenants, work orders, vendors, accounting, and file attachments through natural language.25MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying and creating clients, service orders, collaborators, service requests, equipment, and other resources from the Field Control API directly in conversations with Claude.ISC
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude Desktop to interact with enterprise REST APIs such as Jira, Zoho CRM, Salesforce, SharePoint, Procore, HxGN EAM, and Primavera P6 using OpenAPI/Swagger definitions, with support for various authentication workflows.1211 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude to interact with Atlas CMMS work orders through its REST API, including listing, creating, updating, changing status, assigning, and generating weekly reports.10 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude AI and other MCP clients to interact with Jira Server/Data Center through tools like listing issues, logging work, and updating issues, requiring user confirmation for write operations.886 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 53 tools
Each tool follows a resource+action pattern (list/get/create/update/delete per entity, plus explicit state transitions like accept/start/complete/archive for maintenance and checkin/checkout for reservations and visitors). Boundaries between tools are clear: CRUD vs. lifecycle transitions are named distinctly. An agent can reliably pick the right tool for a given intent.
The overwhelming majority use a consistent io_<verb>_<noun> snake_case pattern (io_list_buildings, io_create_space, io_update_reservation), which is highly predictable. The only deviation is io_healthcheck, which lacks a verb and drops the noun_verb grammar, but it is a single outlier.
53 tools is heavy, well above the 25-tool comfort threshold, but the breadth is largely justified by nine distinct facility resources each receiving full CRUD plus workflow transitions. It is borderline: the surface is defensible but large enough to strain context and discovery.
Core lifecycle coverage is strong across buildings, floors, spaces, users, reservations, visitors, maintenance, mail, and moves, including state transitions and a diagnostic healthcheck. Minor gaps exist: no delete tools for visitors, mail, or moves, and mail/move workflows lack full update coverage, but these are workable around.