honeybook-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to honeybook-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude (or any MCP client) to read and write Clio Manage data—contacts, matters, activities—directly from chat, with flat-fee billing support in one call.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables seamless integration between Claude AI and development tools like VSCode, Augment, Vercel, Airtable, and Square.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects Claude to OurFamilyWizard, giving you natural-language access to your co-parenting messages, calendar, expenses, and journal.11544 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects Claude to OurFamilyWizard, giving you natural-language access to your co-parenting messages, calendar, expenses, and journal.30597 npm14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that gives Claude (or any MCP-compatible LLM) direct access to a self-hosted WordPress site over its REST API.73MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects Claude to your Google Sheets for personal finance tracking, analysis, and reporting — all through natural language.2-
TDQS
Scored across 22 tools
Most tools target a distinct resource+action (get_workspace, list_messages, pay_invoice, sign_contract), and descriptions carefully separate the portal-session vs flow-credential families. However, there is real conceptual overlap between get_workspace (a 'vendor project') and get_project (the portal's Overview), and between list_workspace_files and list_attachments, which could cause occasional misselection.
Nearly the entire set follows a snake_case verb_noun convention (list_projects, get_message, send_message, sign_contract, pay_invoice, mark_messages_seen). The only deviation is honeybook_healthcheck, which uses a server-prefixed style rather than a verb_noun form.
22 tools is on the heavy side but justified by a genuinely broad client-portal domain spanning credentials, projects, workspaces, files, payments, messages, tasks, notes and meetings. No tool appears obviously redundant.
Read coverage is thorough across the portal, but write/action coverage is thin: clients cannot submit questionnaire answers (get_flow only reads them), upload or share files, or perform most mutating actions beyond messaging, signing and paying. These gaps could cause dead ends for common client workflows.