Skip to main content
Glama

fa_get_flights

Read-only

Look up flights by flight number, aircraft registration, or FlightAware ID to view recent, current, and scheduled flights.

Instructions

Get flights for an ident — a flight designator (e.g. UAL123, AAL100), aircraft registration (e.g. N12345), or fa_flight_id. Returns recent, current, and scheduled flights for that ident.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
endNoISO-8601 end of the time window
viewNoResponse shape: "compact" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; "full" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image/avatar URLs from the response; "full" returns FlightAware's payload untouched. No field projection: this server has no verified record of which FlightAware fields matter, and inventing one would risk dropping a field a caller needs.
identYesFlight designator, registration, or fa_flight_id
startNoISO-8601 start of the time window
cursorNoOpaque paging cursor from a previous response's links.next
max_pagesNoMax pages to fetch, 1-20 (AeroAPI default: 1). Capped at 20 since AeroAPI bills per page.
ident_typeNoDisambiguate how `ident` is interpreted

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv0.5.2
    • addedInput schema / properties / view
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Response shape: \"compact\" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; \"full\" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image/avatar URLs from the response; \"full\" returns FlightAware's payload untouched. No field projection: this server has no verified record of which FlightAware fields matter, and inventing one would risk dropping a field a caller needs.",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "compact",
      +    "full"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.3.2
    • changedInput schema / properties / max_pages / description
      Previous value: -"Max pages to fetch (AeroAPI default: 1)"New value: +"Max pages to fetch, 1-20 (AeroAPI default: 1). Capped at 20 since AeroAPI bills per page."
    • changedInput schema / properties / max_pages / maximum
      Previous value: -9007199254740991New value: +20
  4. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so those aspects are covered. The description adds little behavioral context: it does not mention pagination, rate limiting, or that this tool returns a list of flights rather than a single flight. It only restates the purpose and output, which is minimal beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The entire description is a single, well-structured sentence that front-loads the purpose and immediately clarifies the identifier types. There is no filler or redundancy, making it highly concise and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (7 parameters) and the presence of many sibling tools, the description is terse. It does not explain how this tool differs from related tools like fa_get_flight_history or fa_get_scheduled_flights, nor does it clarify the return format (list vs single flight). The schema and annotations cover safety and basic behavior, but the description could be more complete in routing agents to the correct tool among many similar ones.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% description coverage for all 7 parameters, including detailed explanations of ident, view, max_pages, and cursors. The description only reiterates that ident can be a designator, registration, or fa_flight_id, which is already in the schema. No additional semantic value is added for parameter usage beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the verb 'Get' and resource 'flights', and explains that 'ident' can be a flight designator, registration, or fa_flight_id. It distinguishes this as a direct lookup by identifier, not a search. It also states the returned flight types (recent, current, scheduled). However, it does not explicitly differentiate it from sibling tools like fa_get_flight_history or fa_get_scheduled_flights, which might also return flights but with different scopes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you have an ident and need flights for it, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives. There are no exclusions or references to sibling tools. The requirement to pick between related tools like fa_get_flight_track or fa_get_scheduled_flights is left entirely to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.