eventbrite-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to eventbrite-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for accessing Mobilize public API data, including organizations, events, and enums.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for the Humanitix Public API that exposes nine tools to list events, fetch event details, list orders/tickets, check-in counts, and sales summaries.9MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceReadonly MCP server for the Guedder API v3, enabling operational tasks like listing events, searching tickets, and managing purchases via Streamable HTTP or stdio.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for querying Movidesk tickets through the public Movidesk API.8 npm-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceThis is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides tools for interacting with the Eventbrite API. It allows AI assistants to search for events, get event details, retrieve venue information, and more.418 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceFull MCP server for the Eventbrite API with 73 tools to manage events, attendees, orders, tickets, venues, discounts, reports, webhooks, and more.-
TDQS
Scored across 31 tools
Most tools are cleanly scoped by resource and side (organizer vs attendee vs public), and list/get pairs like eb_ticket_classes/eb_ticket_class are clearly distinct. The main overlap is eb_event vs eb_event_details, which both fetch an event by id and could be confused. The various event-list tools (org/organizer/venue/series) are well differentiated by their descriptions.
Names follow a predictable eb_ prefix plus snake_case noun or verb_noun pattern (eb_org_events, eb_search_events, eb_resolve_place, eb_event_description). Minor deviations like eb_healthcheck (single joined word) and eb_me break the strict snake_case convention slightly. Overall the set reads consistently.
At 31 tools the surface is heavy and sits above the comfortable 3-15 range. The domain (events, orders, attendees, venues, organizers, webhooks, reports, search) is genuinely broad, so most tools target distinct resources, but several read operations could plausibly be consolidated. Count is justified by scope yet on the bulky side.
Read/query coverage is strong across events, orders, attendees, venues, organizers, series, webhooks, discounts, ticket groups, reports, search, and reference data. However the surface is almost entirely read-only — no create/update/delete for events, orders, or check-in operations — leaving notable lifecycle gaps. These missing write operations will limit agent workflows beyond discovery and analytics.