easytable_create_booking

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description goes beyond annotations by detailing the exact behavioral difference between confirm false (dry-run, no network call) and confirm true (actual booking). It also discloses the prerequisite of the booking-widget tab, adding significant transparency about side effects and required state.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (3 sentences) with front-loaded key information: purpose, prerequisite, and confirm behavior. Every sentence adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains the key workflow and prerequisites well, but lacks details on return values and error handling. Since there is no output schema, more information on what the tool returns (especially the preview format) would be helpful. The description is adequate but leaves some gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides detailed descriptions for all 13 parameters (100% coverage). The tool description adds high-level context but does not enhance individual parameter meaning. A score of 3 is appropriate given the schema already handles this dimension.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose with a specific verb ('Create a restaurant booking') and distinguishes it from siblings by detailing the workflow (Turnstile token, dry-run vs confirm). This leaves no ambiguity about what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit context about prerequisites (open tab with booking widget) and explains when to use confirm:true vs confirm:false. While it does not explicitly compare to sibling tools, the guidance is clear enough for an AI agent to decide when to invoke this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.