peacelingo-stt-bench
Related Servers
Alternatives to peacelingo-stt-bench
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides ten hosted audio AI tools — TTS, voice cloning, music generation, stem separation, speaker separation, transcription, denoising, media conversion, and job polling — over a single streamable-HTTP endpoint for any MCP-capable agent.MIT
AssemblyAI MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-capable agents to submit and retrieve audio transcriptions, apply speech understanding such as translation, speaker identification, summaries and action items, and enforce guardrails including PII redaction and content moderation.1MIT- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to synthesize and play concise spoken summaries of their work through multiple TTS providers, including Azure, OpenRouter, OpenAI, Gemini, ElevenLabs, and local OpenAI-compatible endpoints. It also lets agents stop playback on demand and check which provider, voice, and audio bridge are currently active.434 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to turn scripts into narration audio with matching SRT/VTT captions in one tool call, plus voice cloning from a reference clip and transcription of local audio or video into subtitles.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to generate speech using Gemini TTS models, with tools for text-to-speech, task polling, and pricing checks.4177 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to upload text-to-speech audio, price and launch blinded human listening studies using pairwise preference or human-vs-AI detection, and retrieve or export scored judgments with confidence intervals. It includes confirmation ceilings and idempotency safeguards to prevent unapproved spending.13MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools have largely distinct purposes: list_providers is introspection, estimate_cost is a pure price calculation, and compare_stt runs an actual benchmark. There is minor overlap since compare_stt also returns estimated cost per provider, but the descriptions make clear it requires a real clip while estimate_cost is a duration-only calculation.
All three names follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (compare_stt, list_providers, estimate_cost) with no convention mixing. The abbreviation 'stt' is consistent with the server domain.
Three tools is on the lean side but each earns its place for a focused STT benchmarking server (run comparison, inspect providers, estimate cost). It is slightly thin but well-scoped rather than padded.
Core workflows are covered, but notable gaps exist: there is no tool to list available clips in the repo, no way to retrieve or persist past benchmark results, and no configuration/key management surface. Agents can work around these but the surface feels incomplete for a benchmark tool.