ExcaliDash MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to ExcaliDash MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to create and manage ExcaliDash drawings through MCP by creating drawings, editing shapes and text, connecting elements, adding images, and organizing drawings into collections.17153 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that lets Claude (and other MCP clients) create, list, read, update, and delete drawings in ExcaliDash via its REST API. It allows users to create diagrams directly from natural language commands like 'draw a flowchart'.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceLets Claude, Codex, Cursor and other MCP clients draw hand-drawn Excalidraw diagrams on a local whiteboard, saving them as real .excalidraw files the agent can inspect, revise and undo. It also provides rendering to PNG, SVG import, and docs so agents can self-serve setup and troubleshooting.56 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Excaliwow that lets AI agents create, read, render, manage, and edit diagrams through the Excaliwow REST API. It provides 18 tools for diagram generation, editing, reading, exporting, and organization, running over stdio for any MCP client.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables creation, management, and export of Excalidraw drawings through natural language. Supports CRUD operations on drawings and export to SVG, PNG, and JSON formats with file-based storage.882,975 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to create, modify, and share diagrams on a live Excalidraw canvas through MCP tools, supporting shapes, text, arrows, batch operations, and export to shareable links with images.3,166 npm8MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool has a distinct purpose: selection state vs. catalog listing vs. selection mutation vs. creation vs. summary reading vs. element inspection vs. operations application. There is no overlapping or ambiguous tool that could cause an agent to misselect. The descriptions clearly delineate responsibilities.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case, with verbs like get, list, select, create, inspect, and apply. The pattern is predictable and uniform across the set, making it easy for an agent to infer behavior from the name.
With exactly 7 tools, the set is well-scoped for a drawing management MCP. Each tool serves a clear, non-redundant function, and the count is neither too sparse nor overwhelming for the stated purpose.
The toolset covers listing, creating, selecting, reading summaries, inspecting elements, and applying operations, which are core workflows. A notable gap is the absence of a delete_drawing tool, and there is no explicit tool for updating drawing metadata, but these are minor and can be worked around.