adb_input_text
Input text into an Android device's active input field via ADB. Specify device serial and the text string.
Instructions
Input text on the device.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | Yes | ||
| serial | Yes |
Input text into an Android device's active input field via ADB. Specify device serial and the text string.
Input text on the device.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | Yes | ||
| serial | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description lacks behavioral details such as whether the device must be unlocked, if special characters are supported, or any side effects. With no annotations, the description should disclose these traits but fails to do so.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it omits important details. While brevity is positive, it sacrifices informativeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain the command's behavior, prerequisites, or limitations, leaving the agent underinformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema defines two required parameters (text, serial) with 0% description coverage. The description does not clarify what these parameters mean or how to use them, offering no added value beyond the field names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Input text on the device.' clearly states the action and target. However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like adb_press_key or adb_tap, which perform similar input actions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any conditions or exclusions. This leaves the agent without context for tool selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/chldu2000/android-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server