Skip to main content
Glama
chinwe

compound-memory

Related Servers

Alternatives to compound-memory

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with persistent, local cross-session shared memory by combining vector semantic retrieval with knowledge graph relationships, and supports short/long-term memory management and local backups.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to store and recall durable facts, decisions, and lessons over MCP using hybrid semantic and keyword search, typed memories, graph relations, sessions, and time-travel queries. Runs locally with no server process or API key, persisting everything to files that both agents and a CLI can share.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to capture, structure, remember, and retrieve source-backed memory as local Markdown files, with reviewable writes and no cloud dependency.
      199
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first, multi-user shared memory for AI agents with semantic search, offline support, and team synchronization.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents like Codex, Grok Build, and Antigravity to share persistent local memory, preferences, project context, tasks, and handoffs using Markdown and SQLite.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first, file-based memory layer for AI agents — one shared Markdown vault across Claude, Codex, Gemini, Cursor and any MCP client. Provides read/write memory tools with an audit trail, per-agent trust levels, and Git sync; no cloud and no lock-in.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct action: search, get, write, link (association), and feedback (outcome reporting). The boundaries are clear with no functional overlap between any pair.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All five tools follow an identical memory_<verb> pattern (write, search, get, link, feedback). Fully predictable and consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools cover the core memory operations (persist, retrieve, associate, evaluate) without redundancy. The set is well-scoped for a memory substrate.

    Completeness4/5

    Write/search/get/link/feedback cover the lifecycle, and update is handled implicitly via same-key writes while obsolete-archiving substitutes for delete. Explicit update/edit or a bulk-list operation are minor gaps an agent can work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessResponsive