snipeit-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to snipeit-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for the Snipe-IT asset management REST API, enabling read and write operations on assets, licenses, accessories, and more.13Apache 2.0
snipe-it-mcpprivate
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Snipe-IT asset management, enabling users to read and manage IT assets, models, manufacturers, and related data through natural language. Designed to feed inventory into lifecycle audits.Apache 2.0- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for the Action1 RMM REST API, enabling access to endpoints, missing updates, vulnerabilities, installed software, policies, automations, and reports.21Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for InvGate Asset Management, enabling natural language queries for assets, people, computers, servers, software, and API health.126 npm1MIT

KVMFleet MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceRead-only MCP server that allows AI assistants to query and monitor KVM Fleet devices, audit logs, and console sessions through the official REST API.55 npm1MIT- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for the SentinelOne management API, exposing sites, endpoint agents, threats, and activity logs with aggregation tools for MSP/MSSP reporting.64 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Most tools map to a distinct resource and action, like get_asset, list_assets, create_asset. The only close pair is assign_license_seat_to_asset and assign_specific_license_seat_to_asset, but their descriptions clearly differentiate auto-selection vs. explicit seat ID.
All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (get, list, create, check, assign, unassign). Even compound targets like list_license_seats and assign_license_seat_to_asset fit the pattern cleanly.
At 16 tools, the set is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range, but the scope justifies it: assets, licenses, users, and reference data (categories, locations, models) are all covered. No bloat or redundant tools beyond the closely related seat assignment pair.
Core asset and license workflows are covered (create, get, list, license seating), but major gaps exist: no update_asset, delete_asset, asset checkin/checkout, or license update/delete. User management is limited to read-only, and reference data cannot be modified.