Skip to main content
Glama
chiku-wa

snipeit-mcp

by chiku-wa

Related Servers

Alternatives to snipeit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Snipe-IT asset management REST API, enabling read and write operations on assets, licenses, accessories, and more.
      13
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Snipe-IT asset management, enabling users to read and manage IT assets, models, manufacturers, and related data through natural language. Designed to feed inventory into lifecycle audits.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for the Action1 RMM REST API, enabling access to endpoints, missing updates, vulnerabilities, installed software, policies, automations, and reports.
      21
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for InvGate Asset Management, enabling natural language queries for assets, people, computers, servers, software, and API health.
      12
      6 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server that allows AI assistants to query and monitor KVM Fleet devices, audit logs, and console sessions through the official REST API.
      5
      5 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map to a distinct resource and action, like get_asset, list_assets, create_asset. The only close pair is assign_license_seat_to_asset and assign_specific_license_seat_to_asset, but their descriptions clearly differentiate auto-selection vs. explicit seat ID.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (get, list, create, check, assign, unassign). Even compound targets like list_license_seats and assign_license_seat_to_asset fit the pattern cleanly.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 16 tools, the set is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range, but the scope justifies it: assets, licenses, users, and reference data (categories, locations, models) are all covered. No bloat or redundant tools beyond the closely related seat assignment pair.

    Completeness3/5

    Core asset and license workflows are covered (create, get, list, license seating), but major gaps exist: no update_asset, delete_asset, asset checkin/checkout, or license update/delete. User management is limited to read-only, and reference data cannot be modified.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues