Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to GMA2 MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control grandMA2 onPC or physical consoles through natural-language commands for live fixture control, cue and preset programming, macros, timecode automation, diagnostics, and live show administration.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Transforms an ETC Eos lighting console into a service controllable by AI assistants and automation tools via MCP and OSC, enabling cue management, preset recall, and channel level control.
      3
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables control of grandMA2 onPC and MA3D over Telnet through MCP tools for querying shows, fixtures, and playback objects, executing commands, adjusting fixture/camera transforms, exporting XML, backing up shows, and capturing MA3D screenshots.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Code or Claude Desktop to control grandMA3 onPC by executing command-line commands, running Lua, reading show data like sequences, cues, executors, patch and pools, driving playback and faders, and looking things up in the manual. It works through a Lua bridge plugin inside onPC, falling back to OSC for write-only commands when the bridge is unavailable.
      75
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling Ableton Live, enabling AI assistants to interact with Live sessions through tools for track/clip/scene management, playback control, and device parameter adjustments.
      48
      -

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 101 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct object/action pairs with detailed descriptions, but there are several overlapping boundaries: label_object vs label_macro_tool vs label_sequence_cue, set_effect_speed vs set_effect_seconds, goto_cue_tool vs execute_sequence(goto), and multiple store/update cue variants. An agent would often need to read full descriptions to avoid picking the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    A loose verb_noun pattern exists, but it is inconsistently applied: some tools have a random _tool suffix (save_show_tool, delete_macro_tool, sync_effects_tool), some use non-verb forms (temp_executor, next_fixture, appearance_cue_across_sequences), and similar operations use different verbs (list_groups vs list_shows_tool, read_cue_info vs get_cue_annotation). The naming feels ad hoc rather than systematic.

    Tool Count1/5

    101 tools is far beyond any reasonable scope for a focused MCP server. Even for a broad grandMA2 console integration, this count is excessive and creates high selection and maintenance overhead.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core workflows comprehensively: cues, presets, macros, effects, executors, variables, timecode, MIDI, show files, and palette building. Notable gaps exist around patch/fixture creation (only delete_fixture is provided) and generic sequence lifecycle, but send_raw_command provides a workaround for these edge cases.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive