glpi_adicionar_solucao

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses a key behavioral trait: the action may close the ticket depending on GLPI configuration. This adds valuable context beyond the basic action. However, it does not mention permissions, reversibility, or other side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise at one sentence, but it lacks parameter details. It is front-loaded with the main verb and object, making the purpose immediately clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and three parameters, the description is incomplete. It fails to explain the meaning of solutiontypes_id, return values, or constraints. Important behavioral context is hinted but not fully developed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description provides no information about the parameters (ticket_id, content, solutiontypes_id). With 0% schema coverage, this is a critical omission. The agent receives no guidance on what to provide for each parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the main action: registering a solution for a ticket. It uses a specific verb ('registra') and resource ('solução do chamado'), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like adding follow-up or tasks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by stating the action, but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No when-to-use or when-not-to conditions are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.