No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 11 tools
Most tools target a clearly distinct analysis domain (ETF cost quality, risk/performance, standard technicals, custom expressions, fundamentals, peer comparison) plus a self-contained hook lifecycle. The main fuzziness is technical_indicators vs custom_analysis, which is largely a subset relationship, and slight overlap between etf_analysis and risk_metrics on tracking error/beta; descriptions explicitly redirect between them, which mitigates it.
Two predictable patterns coexist: noun_phrase report tools (etf_analysis, risk_metrics, technical_indicators, fundamental_ratios, peer_comparison, custom_analysis) and verb_noun hook tools (list_hooks, create_hook, run_hooks, delete_hook, list_indicator_catalog). The split is semantically motivated and readable, though not a single uniform verb_noun scheme.
11 tools is well within the sweet spot and every tool maps to a distinct capability: six analysis endpoints, one catalog/reference tool, and four hook CRUD/execution tools. Nothing feels padded or missing at the count level.
The hook lifecycle (create, list, run, delete) plus a broad analysis surface covers the stated domain with no dead ends for typical workflows. Minor gaps: no update/edit hook (must delete and recreate) and no way to inspect delivered event history beyond each hook's last event.