Selvageofficial
A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceEnables AI-powered code review of Git diffs through natural language, supporting multiple AI models and Git workflows.
31 PyPI
36
Apache 2.0
Angular PR Review MCP
by chetanraj-r
Related Servers
Alternatives to Angular PR Review MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables deterministic behavioral regression review of pull-request diffs by checking changed code against approved incident-derived contracts. It exposes read-only tools to assess diffs and pull requests, list and fetch contracts, and report outcomes over stdio without mutating repositories.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to review GitHub pull requests and GitLab merge requests by fetching PR/MR details and diffs, with optional file-type filtering, and posting inline, general, or batched review comments. Supports self-hosted GitLab and custom project-specific review rules through stdio, SSE, or WebSocket transports.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI-powered pull request review and analysis for Bitbucket Cloud, plus tools to list, create, diff, comment on, and analyze PRs. Supports stdio or HTTP transports with OAuth/bearer auth and pluggable LLM providers.52 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides MCP tools for fetching GitHub PR diffs, searching codebases, running unit tests, and linting code, enabling automated code review and CI/CD workflows.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables fetching Pull Request diffs from GitHub and posting inline review comments directly on PRs, either as pending drafts or published immediately.2-
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 4 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool serves a distinct purpose: fetching the review template, generating a diff, reading a diff, and saving a review. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their functionalities.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get, generate, read, save) with clear object references. The only minor deviation is that 'get_pr_review_template' and 'generate_pr_diff' could be seen as slightly more specific verbs, but they are still consistent with the overall style.
Tool Count5/5
With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for a focused PR review workflow. Each tool covers an essential step: template retrieval, diff generation, diff reading, and saving results, without unnecessary extras.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers the core workflow of generating and reviewing a PR diff. However, a minor gap might be the lack of a tool to fetch PR metadata or commit details beyond the diff, but the current set is sufficient for the stated purpose.
Maintenance
ActivityStale
ResponsivenessNo issues