Skip to main content
Glama
chetangpande-ai

GitHub Repository Health MCP

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
GROQ_MODELYesThe Groq model to use, e.g., openai/gpt-oss-120b.
GITHUB_REPOYesThe GitHub repository name.
GITHUB_OWNERYesThe GitHub owner or organization.
GITHUB_TOKENNoOptional GitHub personal access token for higher rate limits.
GROQ_API_KEYYesYour Groq API key.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
get_repository_infoC

Get current metadata and activity counters for a GitHub repository.

get_open_issuesA

Get open issues, excluding pull requests, for a GitHub repository.

get_recent_commitsA

Get recent commits and their authors for a GitHub repository.

get_workflow_runsB

Get recent GitHub Actions workflow runs and their conclusions.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription
daily_health_reportCreate a prompt for a current GitHub repository health report.
triage_open_issuesCreate a prompt for prioritizing a repository's open issues.

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct aspect of repository health: metadata, issues, commits, and workflow runs. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

Naming Consistency5/5

All four tools follow a consistent get_<resource>_<detail> pattern with snake_case naming. The naming is predictable and easy to extend.

Tool Count5/5

Four tools is well-scoped for a read-only repository health MCP. Each tool covers a meaningful health signal without unnecessary redundancy.

Completeness4/5

The core health indicators—repo stats, issues, commits, and CI status—are covered. Pull request activity and contributor trends are notable omissions, but the current surface is sufficient for basic health assessments.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues