No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 181 tools
With 181 tools spanning overlapping domains, many tools are near-duplicates: macro_growth/macro_gdp/macro_industrial_value_add, industry_quotes/industry_daily_query, draw_ascii_chart/draw_crypto_chart. Existing descriptions help somewhat, but groups like the cycle data tools and the various market/macro snapshots create real boundary confusion. Agents are likely to misselect between these overlapping clusters.
Most tools use snake_case with recognizable domain prefixes (fund_, stock_, macro_, policy_, crypto_), which aids readability. However, verb placement is inconsistent—get_current_time, fund_nav, memory_save, and backtest_strategy all follow different orders. The naming is readable and mostly predictable, but not uniform.
181 tools is an extreme count for a single MCP server, far exceeding the typical 3-15 well-scoped range and even the 25+ 'too many' threshold. The surface is bloated with overlapping, single-purpose, and rarely-needed tools. This overwhelms agents and makes tool selection far more expensive than necessary.
The server covers most financial analysis domains well: stocks, funds, macro, crypto, futures, commodities, cycles, policy, calendar, reports, memory, and portfolio. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no portfolio update/remove, no direct order execution), but these are non-critical for its analytic purpose. Overall, the surface is comprehensive with few dead ends.