Skip to main content
Glama
chenshuai2144

MCP-Server

by chenshuai2144
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP-Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Toolbox

      ai-zerolab
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive toolkit that enhances LLM capabilities through the Model Context Protocol, allowing LLMs to interact with external services including command-line operations, file management, Figma integration, and audio processing.
      183 PyPI
      31
      Apache 2.0

    • MCP Tool Server

      Krishna89287
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that advertises tools with JSON schemas and executes tool calls safely, enabling AI agents to perform actions on real systems.
      -

    • workflows-mcp

      FiveOhhWon
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol implementation that enables LLMs to execute complex, multi-step workflows combining tool usage with cognitive reasoning, providing structured, reusable paths through tasks with advanced control flow.
      9
      13 npm
      28
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes with no overlap: one retrieves GitHub user information based on a username, while the other fetches weather forecasts based on geographic coordinates. An agent would have no difficulty telling these tools apart as they operate in entirely different domains.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb-noun naming pattern (get-github-user and get-weather-forecast), using hyphens for separation. The naming is predictable and readable throughout the set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin and under-scoped for a general-purpose 'MCP-Server' name. The tools cover unrelated domains (GitHub and weather), suggesting a lack of cohesive focus rather than a well-defined purpose that justifies such a minimal set.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for any coherent domain. As a GitHub tool, it lacks basic operations like listing repos or issues; as a weather service, it misses features like historical data or alerts. The two tools together don't form a complete workflow for any identifiable purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources