pg_show_role_memberships
Retrieve memberships of a specified PostgreSQL role to understand role hierarchy and permissions.
Instructions
Show memberships for a PostgreSQL role.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| role | Yes |
Retrieve memberships of a specified PostgreSQL role to understand role hierarchy and permissions.
Show memberships for a PostgreSQL role.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| role | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must fully disclose behavior. Minimal description does not specify permissions, output format, or whether it shows direct or transitive memberships.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words, but lacks important context. Adequate conciseness but could be improved with more informative phrasing.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, no annotations, and parameter count 1, the description is incomplete. Does not clarify what 'memberships' means (e.g., roles the specified role belongs to vs. roles that are members of the specified role).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has one parameter 'role' with no description. Description adds 'for a PostgreSQL role' but no additional semantic value beyond the schema. Schema description coverage is 0%.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it shows memberships for a PostgreSQL role, with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools that involve altering, creating, dropping, or granting roles.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like pg_grant_role or pg_revoke_role. No prerequisites or conditions specified.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/chenkumi/easy-pg-admin-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server