Skip to main content
Glama
chasesaurabh

mcp-page-capture

by chasesaurabh
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-page-capture

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • puppeteer

      silvino-av
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for headless browser automation using Puppeteer, enabling AI to navigate, click, fill forms, take screenshots, and execute JavaScript on web pages.
      -

    • visual-inspector-mcp

      MatinMHF
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to visually inspect and interact with rendered web pages via a persistent headless Chromium browser, supporting navigation, screenshots, clicks, viewport resizing, and console log retrieval.
      8
      1
      MIT

    • MCP Master Puppeteer

      flrngel
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An advanced MCP server for browser automation using Puppeteer, specifically optimized for token efficiency through minimal data returns and progressive enhancement. It enables agents to navigate pages, capture LLM-optimized screenshots, extract structured content, and perform batch interactions.
      3
      -

    • Browser MCP

      blink-new
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for browser automation using Puppeteer that enables AI assistants to navigate web pages, interact with UI elements, and capture screenshots. It supports comprehensive web tasks including form filling, content extraction, and executing custom JavaScript within the browser context.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one captures a rendered screenshot with optional interactions, the other extracts raw HTML/text/DOM. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to choose the correct tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same camelCase verb+noun pattern ('captureScreenshot', 'extractDom'), which is consistent and predictable. The naming clearly conveys the action and target.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only two tools, the server is very focused and minimal. This is appropriate for a simple 'page capture' utility that handles both visual and textual extraction. It's slightly on the low side, but the scope is narrow enough that two tools feel sufficient.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the primary needs for capturing webpage content: visual (screenshot) and textual (DOM extraction). A potential minor gap might be a dedicated tool for downloading assets or getting page metadata, but for most use cases, the two tools provide complete coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources