A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceEnables agents to manage templates and images, create and update image drafts, and render them to PNG, ZIP, or PDF exports via MCP.
4 npm
MIT
ChartQuery MCP Server
by chartquery
Related Servers
Alternatives to ChartQuery MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI clients to generate over 26 chart types via MCP, automatically starting a private rendering service.271MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to render charts as SVG or PNG, validate chart specifications, and retrieve descriptions, schemas, types, and examples through seven tools over stdio or HTTP.104 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables clients to list supported chart methods and render chart images from data and configuration supplied with each call, with optional themes and resource limits.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLM clients to create hand-drawn study-notes style graphics, including charts, concept maps, mind maps, timelines, sketch notes, and 2×2 matrices, as PNG images via MCP.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to inspect, convert, resize, compress, crop, rotate, watermark, background-remove, and batch-process images with secure path confinement and result verification.14MIT
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 19 tools
Disambiguation4/5
The tools are grouped by clear output domains (chart, diagram, label, barcode, QR code) and action suffixes such as render/view/compile/validate help distinguish most usage. Some pairs, especially chart_render vs chart_view and label_preview vs label_compile, could still be confused at a glance, but their descriptions clarify the difference.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most names follow a predictable noun plus action pattern in snake_case, such as chart_render, diagram_view, label_compile, and label_validate. The main deviations are bare noun tools like barcode, chart, usage, qrcode, and stats, which are readable but less consistent than the suffixed variants.
Tool Count3/5
At 19 tools the set is on the heavy side, and the repeated render/view/ai pattern across chart, diagram, and label contributes to bloat. Most tools are purposeful, but the surface is close to the borderline where a smaller unified abstraction would be easier to use.
Completeness4/5
The server covers generation, AI-assisted creation, saved rendering/viewing, and detailed label printer-command workflows, so core lifecycle needs are addressed. Minor gaps remain around explicitly listing, saving, deleting, or managing saved chart/diagram/label resources.