Skip to main content
Glama
charliemday

Pretty Prompt MCP Server

by charliemday
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Pretty Prompt MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • PromptingBox MCP Server

      promptingbox
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Allows users to save, organize, and manage AI prompts, folders, and tags directly within MCP-compatible tools like Claude and Cursor. It supports version history tracking, prompt searching, and the ability to save public templates to a personal collection.
      20
      8
      MIT

    • paretostudio-mcp

      tane994
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables reading, searching, installing, and managing ParetoStudio prompts, agents, and skills from Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP client, and can install agents/skills as files into Claude Code or Codex projects.
      23
      MIT

    • prompts.chat MCP Server

      f
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides access to thousands of AI prompts from prompts.chat, enabling users to search, browse, and use community-curated prompts with variable substitution directly in their AI coding assistant.
      2
      195
      34
      ISC

    • Prompt Bookmarks

      nika-is-nika
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to organize, search, and manage a shared library of prompts across AI tools via the Model Context Protocol. It supports hierarchical folder organization, tagging, and template variable substitution for dynamic prompt generation.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: listing prompts, saving prompts, listing folders, moving prompts, and improving prompts. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun or verb_preposition_noun pattern (list_library_prompts, save_to_library, move_prompt_to_folder), but the mix of styles (list_*, save_to_*, move_*_to_*, improve_*) is slightly inconsistent. Still, names are readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for a library management and prompt improvement service. Each tool has a clear purpose and none are redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers listing, saving, organizing, and improving prompts. Missing delete/update operations for prompts or folders are minor gaps that agents can work around, but the core workflow is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources