Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to anki-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables Claude Code to create, manage, and search Anki flashcards directly from the terminal. It supports batch card creation, deck statistics retrieval, and synchronization with AnkiWeb for cross-platform review.
      8
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants like Claude to interact with Anki flashcard decks, allowing users to create, manage, and update flashcards through natural language conversations.
      41
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Anki flashcards, decks, note types, tags, and media via AnkiConnect. Supports operations like adding, editing, finding, and syncing cards through a local MCP server.
      100
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to seamlessly manage Anki flashcards, decks, and templates through the AnkiConnect API. It supports intelligent querying, batch note creation, and detailed study progress analysis using natural language.
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation (note CRUD, deck management, import/export, sync, progress, health) with no overlapping purposes. Even similar operations like add_notes and update_note are clearly differentiated by their descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The dominant pattern is verb_noun (add_notes, search_notes, list_decks, export_deck), but a few single-word tools (sync, progress, health) deviate. These are still unambiguous and readable, so only a minor inconsistency exists.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools are well-scoped for an Anki MCP server, covering note management, deck operations, backup/restore, sync, and analytics without unnecessary bloat. Count falls comfortably in the ideal range.

    Completeness4/5

    Core CRUD for notes is complete (add, search, update, delete). Deck management lacks a direct delete_deck tool, though export_deck's archive option provides an indirect workaround. Sync and progress round out the lifecycle, leaving only minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues