csw-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to csw-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for Cisco Meraki Dashboard, enabling LLMs to discover devices, check health, troubleshoot, and generate reports via natural language.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for Tenable Vulnerability Management and the Tenable One platform, enabling LLMs to query assets, vulnerabilities, scans, exposure metrics, attack paths, and more via natural language.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that exposes Quickwit log search and aggregations to LLM clients, enabling natural language log investigation.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceSecurity-first, read-only MCP server for Microsoft SQL Server, enabling safe natural-language querying of databases.513 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that enables AI assistants to query ServiceNow instances—incidents, changes, users, CMDB—with malformed query linting and injection protection.7MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server that exposes Kubernetes platform state (tenants, pods, SLOs, ArgoCD applications, chaos schedules, and catalog services) to AI agents, enabling natural language queries about cluster health and configuration.6-
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action, with clear separation between inventory, policy, flow, and vulnerability queries. Minor overlap exists between get_workload and search_inventory for single-host lookup, and between list_scopes and list_workspaces as hierarchical grouping concepts, but descriptions clarify their boundaries.
All tool names use snake_case and generally follow a verb_noun pattern (list_, get_, search_, summarize_). The ranking tools top_risky_flows and top_vulnerable_hosts deviate slightly with a top_ prefix, but remain readable and consistent with each other.
Fifteen tools is within the well-scoped range and each covers a distinct facet of the CSW domain: inventory, sensors, scopes, policies, flows, vulnerabilities, and forensic profiles. No tool appears redundant or unnecessary for the breadth of surface presented.
The surface is entirely read-only, offering broad coverage for analysis and posture assessment but no create/update/delete operations for policies, workspaces, scopes, sensors, or forensic profiles. This is a notable lifecycle gap that will prevent agents from performing management actions through this MCP.