Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to csw-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for Cisco Meraki Dashboard, enabling LLMs to discover devices, check health, troubleshoot, and generate reports via natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Tenable Vulnerability Management and the Tenable One platform, enabling LLMs to query assets, vulnerabilities, scans, exposure metrics, attack paths, and more via natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that exposes Quickwit log search and aggregations to LLM clients, enabling natural language log investigation.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Security-first, read-only MCP server for Microsoft SQL Server, enabling safe natural-language querying of databases.
      5
      13 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that enables AI assistants to query ServiceNow instances—incidents, changes, users, CMDB—with malformed query linting and injection protection.
      7
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server that exposes Kubernetes platform state (tenants, pods, SLOs, ArgoCD applications, chaos schedules, and catalog services) to AI agents, enabling natural language queries about cluster health and configuration.
      6
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource or action, with clear separation between inventory, policy, flow, and vulnerability queries. Minor overlap exists between get_workload and search_inventory for single-host lookup, and between list_scopes and list_workspaces as hierarchical grouping concepts, but descriptions clarify their boundaries.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names use snake_case and generally follow a verb_noun pattern (list_, get_, search_, summarize_). The ranking tools top_risky_flows and top_vulnerable_hosts deviate slightly with a top_ prefix, but remain readable and consistent with each other.

    Tool Count5/5

    Fifteen tools is within the well-scoped range and each covers a distinct facet of the CSW domain: inventory, sensors, scopes, policies, flows, vulnerabilities, and forensic profiles. No tool appears redundant or unnecessary for the breadth of surface presented.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface is entirely read-only, offering broad coverage for analysis and posture assessment but no create/update/delete operations for policies, workspaces, scopes, sensors, or forensic profiles. This is a notable lifecycle gap that will prevent agents from performing management actions through this MCP.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues