Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to User Intent MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server that enables AI assistants to collect interactive user feedback with text and image support via a modern GUI.
      234
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agents to send notifications, copy to clipboard, request confirmations, and collect text input from users across their devices.
      11
      223 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A modern Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to collect interactive user feedback, supporting text and image-based responses.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to ask users questions through a web interface with keyboard shortcuts, supporting single/multiple choice and custom input.
      8 npm
      37
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server enabling AI agents to interact with users via Telegram, supporting message and image sending, inline quick replies, and waiting for user responses.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with a Web UI and desktop app, allowing users to provide interactive feedback to AI models through prompts, images, and session tracking.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is completely unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The tool name 'collect_user_intent' follows a clear verb_noun pattern and is descriptive. With only one tool, there is no inconsistency to evaluate.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server has a single tool, which feels thin compared to the typical 3-15 range. However, the tool is well-scoped for the server's narrow purpose of collecting user intent, so the count is borderline but not problematic.

    Completeness5/5

    For the stated purpose of collecting user intent, the tool covers the full interaction loop: sending a message, displaying it, and collecting a response with optional images. There are no obvious gaps within this narrow domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues